muscadine: (Sociology)
[personal profile] muscadine
It turns out learning styles may not be all that important after all:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/health/views/07mind.html
The current science doesn't lend much support to the idea of matching learning and teaching styles. Learning styles predict enjoyment of a particular teaching style and possibly even aptitude for learning that involves using that style, but it turns out in terms of actual knowledge retention and such there may be a "best" way to teach materials that doesn't necessarily match one's preferred learning style.

For example, both verbal and kinesthetic learners may learn about the structure of complex molecules better through building models in a lab rather than through reading about molecular design. Kinesthetic learners enjoy the lab work more and in fact do better than verbal students on the test after the lab, but when they do the reading exercise they don't do any worse than the verbal students. Verbal students, on the other hand, enjoy the reading more, but those that do the reading exercise do worse than verbal students who do the lab work.

Oh well.
From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

muscadine: (Default)
muscadine

October 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2017 08:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios